CANADIAN RAILWAY OFFICE OF ARBITRATION

& DISPUTE RESOLUTION

CASE NO. 3693

Heard in Montreal, Thursday, 11 September 2008 Concerning

CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY

and

NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE, TRANSPORTATION AND GENERAL

WORKERS UNION OF CANADA (CAW-CANADA)

EX PARTE

DISPUTE:

Concerning the assessment of 20 demerits to the record of Mr. Charles Delaney for failure to present for assigned shift from 04:00-12:00 on Monday August 6, 2007, which resulted in his discharge effective September 1,2007, for accumulation of demerit marks.

JOINT STATEMENT OF ISSUE:

The griever is a composite employee at Moncton. His regular shift is from 04:00 am to 12:00 noon. On August 6, 2007, a statutory holiday, the grievor did not report for his assigned shift. The griever was investigated and 20 demerits were assigned to his record. The Union contests the 20 demerits issued to Mr. Delaney. The Union submits that Mr. Delaney asked for the day off approximately three weeks in advance. According to the Union, Mr. Delaney received no answer and denies seeing the notice posted on August 1, 2007. The Union submits that Mr. Delaney believed that since he had previously taken statutory holidays off, without question, he could do so in this instance. Notwithstanding that, the Union submits that there appears to be a miscommunication between the griever and Supervisor Mackay. In the circumstances, the Union considers dismissal to be exceedingly harsh and given the griever’s long service mitigation must be considered. The Union requests that the 20 demerits be removed from Mr. Delaney’s file, and that Mr. Delaney be reinstated with full compensation and benefits. The Company disagrees.

FOR THE UNION: FOR THE COMPANY:

(SGD.) D. OLSHEWSKI (SGD.) S. GROU

NATIONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR: DIRECTOR, LABOUR RELATIONS

CROA&DR 3693

• 2 - There appeared on behalf of the Company: S. Grou – Manager, Labour Relations, Montreal F. O’Neill – Manager, Labour Relations, Toronto C. MacKay – Sr. Terminal Coordinator, B.I.T. And on behalf of the Union: D. Olshewski – National Representative, Winnipeg G. Green – Local Chairman,

AWARD OF THE ARBITRATOR

Twenty demerits were assessed against the grievor’s record for failure to attend

at work on a statutory holiday for which he was scheduled, Monday August 6, 2007. The

evidence indicates that a considerable time in advance of the holiday the grievor spoke

with his supervisor, Ms. Carrie MacKay, indicating that he wished to take August 6

holiday off in order to have a long weekend. Ms. MacKay indicated to him at that time

that his ability to take the day would depend on operational needs. It does not appear

disputed that in the past he had been granted such holidays, and that the message from

his supervisor was that there could be no guarantee that he would get this one.

The record further discloses that, in accordance with the collective agreement, a

notice was posted on August 1, 2007 indicating that employees would be required to

work their regular shifts on August 6, 2007. As indicated above, the grievor failed to do

so.

During the course of the subsequent investigation Mr. Delaney explained that he

had asked Ms. MacKay for the day off and having had no reply from her he assumed

that his request was granted. In the Arbitrator’s view that response is sharp practice at

CROA&DR 3693

• 3 -

best, implausible at worst. The grievor knew, or reasonably should have known, that the

notice to all employees indicating that they were required to work on August 6, 2007

was posted prominently in the workplace from and after August 1, 2007. The Arbitrator

finds the grievor’s statement that he failed to see the notice to be less than credible.

In the circumstances, bearing in mind that the grievor’s record stood at fifty-nine

demerits, subject to the assessment of ten demerits for yet another infraction (see

CROA&DR 3692 ) I am satisfied that the Company had just cause to assess discipline

against the grievor and that the twenty demerits was within the reasonable range of

appropriate penalty.

For the foregoing reasons the grievance is dismissed.

September 15, 2008 (signed) MICHEL G. PICHER ARBITRATOR